-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue in EDC 0.7.7 concerning AWS objectName/folderName when executing /v3/transferprocesses #501
Comments
Thanks for your contribution 🔥 We will take a look asap 🚀 |
Seeing the version number I imagine you are referring to Tractus-X EDC, please open the issue in the correct repository: |
The mentioned version is indeed wrong and doesn't belong to the EDC project but rather tractus-edc. However, the content of the issue seems to be in the correct place and if there is an error in the way the foldername/objectname attributes are being used this is the place to solve them... |
I was involved in the transfer in question. They are indeed using a Tractus-X EDC 0.7.7, but I've checked and there weren't any contributions to the s3 data plane extension that could have fixed the behaviour in one of the newer versions since 0.7.7. So I assume the issue is still valid. |
tractusx-edc 0.7.7 uses eclipse-edc/technology-AWS v0.7.2. That's an important distinction that needs to be made since the upstream project is not aware of downstream versions. |
The issue is valid if it affects EDC 0.10.x version or the main branch. |
Bug Report
Specified AWS properties folderName & objectName in DataDestination properties for v3/transferprocesses
still original foldername from provider and original filename from provider is being taken (no overwrite possible)
Postman
S3 Bucket
Expected Behavior
expecting as in EDC 0.5.3 that foldername and object name are overwritten based on API properties
Observed Behavior
original filename & foldername have been used instead (original from data provider, not as specified as consumer)
Steps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Context Information
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: