Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename gef-legacy to gef-classic #5

Closed
vogella opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 8 comments
Closed

Rename gef-legacy to gef-classic #5

vogella opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@vogella
Copy link
Contributor

vogella commented Feb 18, 2022

gef-legacy gives a very negative feeling about the project. I suggest we rename it to gef-swt.

@azoitl
Copy link
Contributor

azoitl commented Feb 22, 2022

As in GEF5 gef fx is just one feature of the whole GEF 5 suite I find gef-swt to limiting in scope. How about gef-classic?

@vogella
Copy link
Contributor Author

vogella commented Feb 22, 2022

@azoitl sounds also fine for me

Any other opinions?

@serge-rider
Copy link
Contributor

gef-classic sounds good 👍

@vogella vogella changed the title Rename gef-legacy to a better name, suggestion is to use gef-swt Rename gef-legacy to gef-classic Mar 30, 2022
@vogella
Copy link
Contributor Author

vogella commented Mar 30, 2022

@mwienand can you approved as project lead?

@mwienand
Copy link
Contributor

mwienand commented Apr 1, 2022

Sounds good to me. Btw, GEF Classic reminds me of OPC Classic.

@vogella
Copy link
Contributor Author

vogella commented Apr 1, 2022

@vogella
Copy link
Contributor Author

vogella commented Apr 1, 2022

Done, thanks.

@mwienand do you if we have an active build job for the old legacy repo which we need to update?

@azoitl
Copy link
Contributor

azoitl commented Apr 1, 2022

Sounds good to me. Btw, GEF Classic reminds me of OPC Classic.

Maybe that's where I got the inspiration from ;-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants