Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Leshan supports only COAP ? Shall we use STOMP service supported devices with eclipse-leshan? #1465

Closed
M0ulinamary opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
question Any question about leshan

Comments

@M0ulinamary
Copy link

Question

I am about to start learning the eclipse leshan with the STOMP service. Please guide where to start with

@M0ulinamary M0ulinamary added the question Any question about leshan label Jul 10, 2023
@sbernard31
Copy link
Contributor

sbernard31 commented Jul 10, 2023

I am about to start learning the eclipse leshan with the STOMP service. Please guide where to start with

Hi, If you want help you should try to ask less general question 😬

@sbernard31
Copy link
Contributor

sbernard31 commented Jul 10, 2023

Oh there is also some more specific question in the title, I tried to answer.

Leshan supports only COAP ?

Leshan aims to implement LWM2M specification.
Leshan v1.x (current stable version) implements LWM2M v1.0.x which specifies only LWM2M over coap(s)
Leshan v2.x (in development version) implements LWM2M v1.1.x which specifies only LWM2M over :

Since Leshan v2.x a transport abstraction has been added to Leshan to be able to add new official (or to let user add their own) transport but this is pretty new and so probably improvable. See for more details : #1025 (comment)

LWM2M v1.2.x specifies LWM2M over :

but currently there is no version of Leshan which aims to implement LWM2M v1.2.x.

Shall we use STOMP service supported devices with eclipse-leshan?

I'm not sure to understand the question.
Are you talking about STOMP ?
I don't know any LWM2M specification which define STOMP as transport. If this exits please share the link.

@sbernard31
Copy link
Contributor

Should we close this issue ?

@sbernard31
Copy link
Contributor

I close it but feel free to reopen if needed.

If you succeed to implement something using new Transport Layer Abstraction, please let us know. 🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Any question about leshan
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants