jdk_util_1_FAILED java/util/zip/ZipFile/ManyEntries.java invalid entry crc-32 & java/util/zip/TestCRC32.java Calculated checksum result was invalid

[JasonFengJ9]

JDK20 ppc64le_linux

22:27:36  ===============================================
22:27:36  Running test jdk_util_1 ...
22:27:36  ===============================================
22:27:36  jdk_util_1 Start Time: Fri May 19 22:27:35 2023 Epoch Time (ms): 1684549655618
22:27:36  variation: -Xdump:system:none -Xdump:heap:none -Xdump:system:events=gpf+abort+traceassert+corruptcache Mode650
22:27:36  JVM_OPTIONS:  -Xdump:system:none -Xdump:heap:none -Xdump:system:events=gpf+abort+traceassert+corruptcache -XX:-UseCompressedOops 

22:44:30  TEST: java/util/zip/ZipFile/ManyEntries.java

22:44:30  STDERR:
22:44:30  java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid entry crc-32 (expected 0x0 but got 0xa0058808)
22:44:30  	at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.closeEntry(ZipOutputStream.java:308)
22:44:30  	at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.putNextEntry(ZipOutputStream.java:201)
22:44:30  	at ManyEntries.test(ManyEntries.java:75)
22:44:30  	at ManyEntries.main(ManyEntries.java:45)
22:44:30  	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:104)
22:44:30  	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:578)
22:44:30  	at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainActionHelper$AgentVMRunnable.run(MainActionHelper.java:312)
22:44:30  	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1639)
22:44:30  	Suppressed: java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid entry crc-32 (expected 0x0 but got 0xa0058808)
22:44:30  		at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.closeEntry(ZipOutputStream.java:308)
22:44:30  		at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.finish(ZipOutputStream.java:373)
22:44:30  		at java.base/java.util.zip.DeflaterOutputStream.close(DeflaterOutputStream.java:244)
22:44:30  		at java.base/java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream.close(ZipOutputStream.java:390)
22:44:30  		at ManyEntries.test(ManyEntries.java:58)
22:44:30  		... 5 more
22:44:30  TEST RESULT: Failed. Execution failed: `main' threw exception: java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid entry crc-32 (expected 0x0 but got 0xa0058808)
22:44:30  --------------------------------------------------
22:46:01  Test results: passed: 920; failed: 1
22:46:04  Report written to /home/jenkins/workspace/Test_openjdk20_j9_sanity.openjdk_ppc64le_linux_Nightly/aqa-tests/TKG/output_16845449823925/jdk_util_1/report/html/report.html
22:46:04  Results written to /home/jenkins/workspace/Test_openjdk20_j9_sanity.openjdk_ppc64le_linux_Nightly/aqa-tests/TKG/output_16845449823925/jdk_util_1/work
22:46:04  Error: Some tests failed or other problems occurred.
22:46:04  -----------------------------------
22:46:04  jdk_util_1_FAILED

JDK20 ppc64le_linux

14:59:55  ===============================================
14:59:55  Running test jdk_util_1 ...
14:59:55  ===============================================
14:59:55  jdk_util_1 Start Time: Fri May 19 15:59:15 2023 Epoch Time (ms): 1684522755376
14:59:55  variation: -Xdump:system:none -Xdump:heap:none -Xdump:system:events=gpf+abort+traceassert+corruptcache Mode650
14:59:55  JVM_OPTIONS:  -Xdump:system:none -Xdump:heap:none -Xdump:system:events=gpf+abort+traceassert+corruptcache -XX:-UseCompressedOops 

15:26:51  TEST: java/util/zip/TestCRC32.java

15:26:51  STDERR:
15:26:51  java.lang.RuntimeException: Calculated checksum result was invalid. Expected cbf43926, but got 0.
15:26:51  	at ChecksumBase.checkChecksum(ChecksumBase.java:92)
15:26:51  	at ChecksumBase.testBytes(ChecksumBase.java:56)
15:26:51  	at ChecksumBase.testAll(ChecksumBase.java:37)
15:26:51  	at TestCRC32.main(TestCRC32.java:37)
15:26:51  	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:104)
15:26:51  	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:578)
15:26:51  	at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainActionHelper$AgentVMRunnable.run(MainActionHelper.java:312)
15:26:51  	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1639)
15:26:51  
15:26:51  JavaTest Message: Test threw exception: java.lang.RuntimeException

JDK8 ppc64_aix(aix823)
JDK11 ppc64_aix
JDK17 ppc64_aix

Originally posted by @JasonFengJ9 in #14948 (comment)

This failure occurred across Java level/platforms abuilds, tentatively set it as a blocker.
JDK8 abuild - https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Pipeline-OpenJDK8-Acceptance/69/
JDK11 abuild - https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Pipeline-OpenJDK11-Acceptance/82/
JDK17 abuild - https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Pipeline-OpenJDK17-Acceptance/66/
JDK20 abuild - https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Pipeline-OpenJDK20-Acceptance/4/
OMR abuild - https://openj9-jenkins.osuosl.org/job/Pipeline-OMR-Acceptance/520/

[JasonFengJ9]

@bhavanisn as per our Slack conversation, pls provide an update on the PR in progress.

[bhavanisn]

@JasonFengJ9 The issue is caused as 2 crc routines were used in this case and out of 2 only one routine was AOT-enabled. I have added a fix to be able to use the other routine also in AOT. Running some tests and clean up. Hoping to have a PR by tomorrow.

[JasonFengJ9]

Hoping to have a PR by tomorrow.

Thanks for the update, is this a straightforward change? I am wondering is it safer to revert the culprit PR and allow OMR acceptance build to proceed which blocks 0.40 code split initially targeted on May 19th (now delayed one week).
If we are confident the fix can be reviewed and delivered no later than this Friday, I have no objections.

FYI @zl-wang @0xdaryl

[bhavanisn]

@JasonFengJ9 I have created PRs for the issue.
Pipelines I ran yday with the fix : https://hyc-runtimes-jenkins.swg-devops.com/view/OpenJ9%20-%20Personal/job/Pipeline-Build-Test-Personal/16737/
ppc64le_linux: all passed
ppc64_aix:
jdk8 failures are related to libawt. Re-running https://hyc-runtimes-jenkins.swg-devops.com/job/Grinder/33074/
jdk11 pipeline timedout. Re-running https://hyc-runtimes-jenkins.swg-devops.com/job/Grinder/33075/ : Looks like stuck to get a node to schedule the run.
jdk20 Failed with git issue. I will try to re-run this

@zl-wang Please review.