Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sig#987 - Enhance API by new parameter displayTechnicalUser #1210

Open
3 tasks
MaximilianHauer opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks

sig#987 - Enhance API by new parameter displayTechnicalUser #1210

MaximilianHauer opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@MaximilianHauer
Copy link

MaximilianHauer commented Dec 16, 2024

Description

Implement a new parameter that defines if the technical user details created for an app/service should be visible for the subscriber.
This configuration will be set in the app release process.

This boolean defines if the subscriber is able to see the technical user in the technical user management section later on.

add "displayTechnicalUser": "boolean" to be saved in the following api
/api/apps/appreleaseprocess/createapp
/api/services/servicerelease/addservice

add "displayTechnicalUser": "boolean" to be provided in the following api
/api/apps/{appID}
/api/services/{serviceId}

Acceptance Criteria

  • There should be a new boolean parameter called "displayTechnicalUser" added to the app release process API endpoint /api/apps/appreleaseprocess/createapp.
  • There should be a new boolean parameter called "displayTechnicalUser" added to the service release process API endpoint /api/services/servicerelease/addservice.
  • The "displayTechnicalUser" parameter should be included in the response of the API endpoints /api/apps/{appID} and /api/services/{serviceId}.

Additional Information

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: IN REVIEW
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants