You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Compatibility Tests between a current connector development and former versions are established with the last connector release. The established infrastructure is only rudimentary available and needs to be brought to a level, that provides a qualitative result concerning the compatibility.
What's the benefit?
Significant reduction of incompatibility risk between different version of the connector.
What are the Risks/Dependencies ?
none
Detailed explanation
Evaluate synergies between existing e2e tests and compatibility tests to prevent double maintenance of test cases
Improve existing coverage of use cases in additional test cases
Invent mechanisms to ensure outside compatibility of visible data structures defined by the DSP (e.g. the Catalog)
A documented test concept for e2e and compatibility tests
Test cases for known inconsistencies are implemented
Risk assessment of the remaining risks do not show remaining known major risks
Test Cases
n/a
Architectural Relevance
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented.
In the context of the standards 126 and 127, typically only one is applicable, depending on the specific use case. Please cross out one of the two standards that does not apply.
This feature aligns with our current architectural guidelines
The impact on the overall system architecture has been assessed. The Feature does not require changes to the architecture or any existing standard? Please have a look here on the overarching architecture
Potential risks or conflicts with existing architecture has been assessed
Justification:(Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
I am aware that my request may not be developed if no developer can be found for it. I'll try to contribute a developer (bring your own developer)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Overview
Explain the topic in 2 sentences
Compatibility Tests between a current connector development and former versions are established with the last connector release. The established infrastructure is only rudimentary available and needs to be brought to a level, that provides a qualitative result concerning the compatibility.
What's the benefit?
Significant reduction of incompatibility risk between different version of the connector.
What are the Risks/Dependencies ?
none
Detailed explanation
Feature Team
Contributor
Committer
User Stories
Acceptance Criteria
Test Cases
n/a
Architectural Relevance
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented.
In the context of the standards 126 and 127, typically only one is applicable, depending on the specific use case. Please cross out one of the two standards that does not apply.
Justification: (Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: