You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The LeastRecentlyUsedCache used for saving connections have an expiration threshold of 36 hours. I assume this implies if a client sleeps for more than 36 hours and then wakes to send a data packet, it would be discarded and client will need to reconnect. I tried a quick incomplete read of the RFC 6347 and couldn't find points about a need for session timeout.
Is this session timeout mandatory. Why are not we letting the session stay for ever until LRU capacity is reached? Or is my understanding wrong ? Kindly let me know if this query has to go to a mailing list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The TLS 1.2 spec say: "An upper limit of 24 hours is suggested for
session ID lifetimes, since an attacker who obtains a master_secret
may be able to impersonate the compromised party until the
corresponding session ID is retired."
By the way we should maybe set it to 24 by default.
I suppose you already see that but you can configure the threshold with an adapted value for your use case. setExpirationThreshold
If you don't want expiration (not really recommended ;)) you could implement your own ConnectionStore.
About the mailing list vs github issue: Mailing list is more for asking questions (like this one) github issue to report bugs (or request enhancement)
The
LeastRecentlyUsedCache
used for saving connections have an expiration threshold of 36 hours. I assume this implies if a client sleeps for more than 36 hours and then wakes to send a data packet, it would be discarded and client will need to reconnect. I tried a quick incomplete read of the RFC 6347 and couldn't find points about a need for session timeout.Is this session timeout mandatory. Why are not we letting the session stay for ever until LRU capacity is reached? Or is my understanding wrong ? Kindly let me know if this query has to go to a mailing list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: