-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make Che Plugin Broker use self-signed certificate #13565
Conversation
2dc8a51
to
4ce65e0
Compare
Signed-off-by: Sergii Leshchenko <sleshche@redhat.com>
4ce65e0
to
1ab7a0e
Compare
ci-test |
Results of automated E2E tests of Eclipse Che Multiuser on OCP: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, one comment.
@@ -560,8 +560,8 @@ che.singleport.wildcard_domain.ipless=false | |||
|
|||
# Docker image of Che plugin broker app that resolves workspace tooling configuration and copies | |||
# plugins dependencies to a workspace | |||
che.workspace.plugin_broker.init.image=eclipse/che-init-plugin-broker:v0.18 | |||
che.workspace.plugin_broker.unified.image=eclipse/che-unified-plugin-broker:v0.18 | |||
che.workspace.plugin_broker.init.image=eclipse/che-init-plugin-broker:v0.19.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason we want to to use v0.19.0
? If we use v0.19
we would pick up bugfix releases without further modification.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was my fault that I specified v0.19.0
as dockerimage and latest dockerimage tag during releasing of che-plugin-broker
and v0.19
is not available =(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries 👍
Selenium tests execution on Eclipse Che Multiuser on OCP (https://ci.codenvycorp.com/job/che-pullrequests-test-ocp/1871//Selenium_20tests_20report/) doesn't show any regression against this Pull Request. |
What does this PR do?
Makes Che Plugin Broker use a self-signed certificate to archive it was needed:
This is tested on local OCP deployed with
ocp.sh
:https://youtu.be/8z8WXA82G28
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
#12634
Release Notes
N/A
Docs PR
N/A