Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Serialize/deseialize list of DTO using same mechanism as single DTO object #14792

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 8, 2019

Conversation

mshaposhnik
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Different ways of serialization/deserialization of the single and list of DTO may provide erroneous effects, when, for example, Gson type adapters is applied when single DTO is requested, and not applied when list is requested, so the same objects have different representation. This PR corrects situation for DTO lists.

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

#14739

Release Notes

N/A

Docs PR

N/A

@che-bot che-bot added status/code-review This issue has a pull request posted for it and is awaiting code review completion by the community. kind/bug Outline of a bug - must adhere to the bug report template. labels Oct 7, 2019
Signed-off-by: Max Shaposhnik <mshaposh@redhat.com>
@che-bot
Copy link
Contributor

che-bot commented Oct 7, 2019

E2E Happy path tests of Eclipse Che Single User on K8S (minikube v1.1.1) has been successful:

@che-bot
Copy link
Contributor

che-bot commented Oct 7, 2019

E2E Happy path tests of Eclipse Che Single User on K8S (minikube v1.1.1) has been successful:

@che-bot
Copy link
Contributor

che-bot commented Oct 7, 2019

E2E tests of Eclipse Che Multiuser on OCP has been successful:

Copy link
Contributor

@skabashnyuk skabashnyuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please wait for at least one more review

Copy link
Member

@sleshchenko sleshchenko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can not say that I reviewed very precisely but LGTM in general

@mshaposhnik mshaposhnik merged commit 88033a0 into master Oct 8, 2019
@mshaposhnik mshaposhnik deleted the listdto branch October 8, 2019 07:43
@che-bot che-bot removed the status/code-review This issue has a pull request posted for it and is awaiting code review completion by the community. label Oct 8, 2019
@che-bot che-bot added this to the 7.3.0 milestone Oct 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Outline of a bug - must adhere to the bug report template.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants