You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 21, 2023. It is now read-only.
I know syntax highlighting is a client thing #283, but it would be nice to have a language server that can notify connecting clients about the languages (and maybe keywords or other information about the languages).
I use a language server that supports multiple DSLs that may change over time and Theia as a client.
Is this something you plan to add, is it out of question (as mentioned in #283), or does this already work via semantic coloring (the syntax highlighting part)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ok, I already looked into that, but it does not seem useful for my context, since keywords of the language are still hard coded in the TextMate grammar. Currently I use an LS-extension that responses with the keywords for the languages and dynamically adds syntax highlighting.
Back to my question: Is it planed to add a notification to inform the client which languages the LS supports? This seems to be a useful feature to me.
the packaging of ls is client specific so it already knows the languages anyway cause you have to define what languages exist in all clients
the keywords for client side highlighting and the one from server side highlighting dont need to relate. so the server will send the highlighting regions for the keywords as well. so an empty list or some dummy keywords in the textmate grammar should be sufficient
I know syntax highlighting is a client thing #283, but it would be nice to have a language server that can notify connecting clients about the languages (and maybe keywords or other information about the languages).
I use a language server that supports multiple DSLs that may change over time and Theia as a client.
Is this something you plan to add, is it out of question (as mentioned in #283), or does this already work via semantic coloring (the syntax highlighting part)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: