Thanks for contributing! We want to ensure that urql
evolves and fulfills
its idea of extensibility and flexibility by seeing continuous improvements
and enhancements, no matter how small or big they might be.
If you're about to add a new exchange, please consider publishing it as a separate package.
We follow fairly standard but lenient rules around pull requests and issues. Please pick a title that describes your change briefly, optionally in the imperative mood if possible.
If you have an idea for a feature or want to fix a bug, consider opening an issue first. We're also happy to discuss and help you open a PR and get your changes in!
- If you have a question, try creating a GitHub Discussions thread.
- If you think you've found a bug, open a new issue.
- or, if you found a bug you'd like to fix, open a PR.
- If you'd like to propose a change open an RFC issue. You can read more about the RFC process below.
There are no strict conventions, but we do have two templates in place that will fit most issues, since questions and other discussion start on GitHub Discussions. The bug template is fairly standard and the rule of thumb is to try to explain what you expected and what you got instead. Following this makes it very clear whether it's a known behavior, an unexpected issue, or an undocumented quirk.
We follow an RFC proposal process. This allows anyone to propose a new feature or a change, and allows us to communicate our current planned features or changes, so any technical discussion, progress, or upcoming changes are always documented transparently. You can find the RFC template in our issue creator.
All RFCs are added to the RFC Lifecycle board. This board tracks where an RFC stands and who's working on it until it's completed. Bugs and PRs may end up on there too if no corresponding RFC exists or was necessary. RFCs are typically first added to "In Discussion" until we believe they're ready to be worked on. This step may either be short, skipped, or rather long, if no plan is in place for a change yet. So if you see a way to help, please leave some suggestions.
This also comes with no strict conventions. We only ask you to follow the PR template we have in place more strictly here than the templates for issues, since it asks you to list a summary (maybe even with a short explanation) and a list of technical changes.
If you're resolving an issue please don't forget to add Resolve #123
to the description so that
it's automatically linked, so that there's no ambiguity and which issue is being addressed (if any)
You'll find that a comment by the "Changeset" bot may pop up. If you don't know what a changeset is and why it's asking you to document your changes, read on at "How do I document a change for the changelog"
We also typically name our PRs with a slightly descriptive title, e.g. (shortcode) - Title
,
where shortcode is either the name of a package, e.g. (core)
and the title is an imperative mood
description, e.g. "Update X" or "Refactor Y."
Luckily it's not hard to get started. You can install dependencies using yarn.
Please don't use npm
to respect the lockfile.
yarn
There are multiple commands you can run in the root folder to test your changes:
# TypeScript checks:
yarn run check
# Linting (prettier & eslint):
yarn run lint
# Jest Tests (for all packages):
yarn run test
# Builds (for all packages):
yarn run build
You can find the main packages in packages/*
and the addon exchanges in exchanges/*
.
Each package also has its own scripts that are common and shared between all packages.
# Jest Tests for the current package:
yarn run test
# Linting (prettier & eslint):
yarn run lint
# Builds for the current package:
yarn run build
# TypeScript checks for the current package:
yarn run check
While you can run build
globally in the interest of time it's advisable to only run it
on the packages you're working on. Note that TypeScript checks don't require any packages
to be built.
It's always good practice to run the tests when making changes. If you're unsure which packages
may be affected by your new tests or changes you may run yarn test --watch
in the root of
the repository.
If your editor is not set up with type checks you may also want to run yarn run check
on your
changes.
Additionally you can head to any example in the examples/
folder
and run them. There you'll also need to run yarn
to install their
dependencies. All examples are started using yarn start
.
We ensure consistency in urql
's codebase using eslint
and prettier
.
They are run on a precommit
hook, so if something's off they'll try
to automatically fix up your code, or display an error.
If you have them set up in your editor, even better!
This project uses changesets. This means that for every PR there must be documentation for what has been changed and which package is affected.
You can document a change by running changeset
, which will ask you which packages
have changed and whether the change is major/minor/patch. It will then ask you to write
a change entry as markdown.
# In the root of the urql repository call:
yarn changeset
This will create a new "changeset file" in the .changeset
folder, which you should commit and
push, so that it's added to your PR.
This will eventually end up in the package's CHANGELOG.md
file when we do a release.
You won't need to add a changeset if you're simply making "non-visible" changes to the docs or other
files that aren't published to npm
.
Read more about adding a changeset
here.
Hold up, that's automated! Since we use changeset
to document our changes, which determines what
goes into the changelog and what kind of version bump a change should make, you can also use the
tool to check what's currently posed to change after a release batch using: yarn changeset status
.
We have a GitHub Actions workflow which is triggered whenever new changes are merged. It will always open a "Version Packages" PR which is kept up-to-date. This PR documents all changes that are made and will show in its description what all new changelogs are going to contain for their new entries.
Once a "Version Packages" PR is approved by a contributor and merged, the action will automatically
take care of creating the release, publishing all updated packages to npm
, and creating
appropriate tags on GitHub too.
This process is automated, but the changelog should be checked for errors.
As to when to merge the automated PR and publish? Maybe not after every change. Typically there are two release batches: hotfixes and release batches. We expect that a hotfix for a single package should go out as quickly as possible if it negatively affects users. For release batches however, it's common to assume that if one change is made to a package that more will follow in the same week. So waiting for a day or two when other changes are expected will make sense to keep the fatigue as low as possible for downstream maintainers.
It may be a good idea to keep all dependencies on the urql
repository up-to-date every now and
then. Typically we do this by running yarn upgrade-interactive --latest
and checking one-by-one
which dependencies will need to be bumped. In case of any security issues it may make sense to
just run yarn upgrade [package]
.
Afterwards yarn
may accidentally introduce duplicate packages due to some transitive dependencies
having been upgraded separately. This can be fixed by running:
npx yarn-deduplicate yarn.lock
yarn
It's common to then create a PR (with a changeset documenting the packages that need to reflect new
changes if any dependencies
have changed) with the name of
"(chore) - Upgrade direct and transitive dependencies" or something similar.
First of all we need to know where to put the package.
- Exchanges should be added to
exchanges/
and the folder should be the plain name of the exchange. Since thepackage.json:name
is following the convention of@urql/exchange-*
the folder should just be without this conventional prefix. - All other packages should be added to
packages/
. Typically all packages should be named@urql/*
and their folders should be named exactly this without the prefix or*-urql
. Optionally if the package will be named*-urql
then the folder can take on the same name.
When adding a new package, start by copying a package.json
file from another project.
You may want to alter the following fields first:
name
version
(either start at0.1.0
or1.0.0
)description
repository.directory
keywords
Make sure to also alter the devDependencies
, peerDependencies
, and dependencies
to match
the new package's needs.
The main
and module
fields follow a convention:
All output bundles will always be output in the ./dist
folder by rollup
, which is set up in
the build
script. Their filenames are a "kebab case" (dash-cased) version of the name
field with
an appropriate extension (.esm.js
for module
and .cjs.js
for main
).
If your entrypoint won't be at src/index.ts
you may alter it. But the types
field has to match
the same file relative to the dist/types
folder, where rollup
will output the TypeScript
declaration files.
When setting up your package make sure to create a src/index.ts
file
(or any other file which you've pointed package.json:source
to). Also don't forget to
copy over the tsconfig.json
from another package (You won't need to change it).
The scripts.prepare
task is set up to check your new package.json
file for correctness. So in
case you get anything wrong, you'll get a short error when running yarn
after setting your new
project up. Just in case! 😄
Afterwards you can check whether everything is working correctly by running:
yarn
yarn run check
At this point, don't publish the package or a prerelease yourself if you can avoid it. If you can't
or have already, we'll need to get the rights fixed by adding the package to the @urql
scope.
Typically what we do is:
npm access grant read-write urql:developers [package]
npm access grant read-write formidable:formidable [package]