Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: use cookie@0.7.2 #39

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 13, 2024
Merged

feat: use cookie@0.7.2 #39

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 13, 2024

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Oct 13, 2024

closes eggjs/egg#5363

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced customizable error handling with multiple response formats (HTML, JSON, JS).
    • Added a new ErrorView class for enhanced error reporting in web applications.
    • Updated the README to include installation instructions and a Contributors section.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling logic in the application.
  • Chores

    • Updated copyright notice in the LICENSE file.
    • Modified CI workflow configurations for better dependency management and version support.
    • Updated dependency versions in package.json.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The head commit changed during the review from d34c490 to e6a99f5.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the removal of outdated files, updates to workflow configurations, modifications to the LICENSE and README.md files, and enhancements to error handling in the application. The cookie dependency version has been upgraded to address a security vulnerability. Additionally, new error handling methods and a complete ErrorView class have been introduced to improve error reporting.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, .github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml Deleted files for pull request template and CodeQL analysis workflow.
.github/workflows/nodejs.yml, .github/workflows/release.yml Updated CI workflow configurations, including job sources, Node.js version support, and removal of workflow_dispatch triggers.
LICENSE Updated copyright notice to "2017-present."
README.md Modified installation instructions, corrected property descriptions, and added a "Contributors" section.
agent.js, config/config.default.js, lib/utils.js Removed strict mode directive 'use strict'; from multiple files.
app.js Introduced customizable error response structure with methods for handling different formats (HTML, JSON, JS).
lib/error_view.js Added complete implementation of ErrorView class for error reporting.
package.json Updated cookie dependency version from ^0.3.1 to ^0.7.2 and simplified script commands by removing --full-trace option.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Upgrade cookie dependency to address CVE-2024-47764 (CWE-74) (#5363)
Ensure that all dependencies are up-to-date and secure (#5363) Other dependencies were not addressed in this PR.

🐰 In the meadow where bunnies play,
We’ve tidied up in a big, bright way!
With errors caught and cookies sweet,
Our code now dances on happy feet!
Let’s hop along, with joy we cheer,
For every change brings us near! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Oct 13, 2024

New dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/cookie@0.7.2 None 0 23.4 kB blakeembrey, dougwilson

View full report↗︎

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)

44-44: Consider the impact of removing --full-trace from the test script.

The removal of the --full-trace option from the test-local script will reduce the verbosity of test output. While this can make the output more concise and easier to read in common scenarios, it might also make it more challenging to debug complex test failures.

Consider the following options:

  1. Keep the change as is for cleaner output.
  2. Revert the change to maintain detailed error traces.
  3. Add a separate script for verbose testing, e.g., "test-verbose": "egg-bin test --full-trace".

Please choose the option that best fits your team's debugging and testing practices.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ecc3405 and 018ccb8.

📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/nodejs.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
  • LICENSE (1 hunks)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
  • agent.js (0 hunks)
  • app.js (0 hunks)
  • config/config.default.js (0 hunks)
  • lib/error_view.js (0 hunks)
  • lib/utils.js (0 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
  • .github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml
  • agent.js
  • app.js
  • config/config.default.js
  • lib/error_view.js
  • lib/utils.js
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • LICENSE
  • README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-13: Review of workflow changes

The changes to the release workflow have several implications:

  1. The removal of the workflow_dispatch trigger means this workflow can no longer be manually triggered. This could limit flexibility in release management, especially for hotfixes or emergency releases.

  2. The uses directive has been updated from artusjs/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-release.yml@v1 to eggjs/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-release.yml@master. This change suggests a move from Artus.js to Egg.js for the release workflow. However, using @master instead of a specific version could lead to unexpected changes if the master branch of the eggjs/github-actions repository is updated.

  3. The removal of checkTest: false might indicate that tests are now being run as part of the release process, which is generally a good practice for ensuring release quality.

Consider the following suggestions:

  1. If manual triggering is still needed, reintroduce the workflow_dispatch trigger.
  2. Use a specific version or commit SHA for the uses directive instead of @master to ensure consistency and predictability in the release process.
  3. If skipping tests was intentional before, ensure that the new workflow doesn't introduce unexpected delays or failures in the release process due to running tests.

To verify the impact of these changes, you can run the following script:

This script will help identify if the removed features (workflow_dispatch, artusjs/github-actions, and checkTest) are still in use elsewhere in the project, which might require further updates.

✅ Verification successful

Verification Successful

The changes to .github/workflows/release.yml have been successfully verified:

  • workflow_dispatch trigger has been removed and is not present in any other workflows.
  • uses directive has been updated to eggjs/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-release.yml@master, and no other workflows are using artusjs/github-actions.
  • checkTest: false parameter has been removed and is not present in any other workflows.

No issues found with these changes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the release workflow configuration and its usage

# Check if workflow_dispatch is used in other workflows
echo "Checking for workflow_dispatch usage in other workflows:"
grep -r "workflow_dispatch" .github/workflows/* || echo "No other workflows use workflow_dispatch"

# Check for other usages of artusjs/github-actions
echo -e "\nChecking for other usages of artusjs/github-actions:"
grep -r "artusjs/github-actions" .github/workflows/* || echo "No other workflows use artusjs/github-actions"

# Check for checkTest parameter in other workflows
echo -e "\nChecking for checkTest parameter in other workflows:"
grep -r "checkTest:" .github/workflows/* || echo "No other workflows use checkTest parameter"

Length of output: 910

.github/workflows/nodejs.yml (1)

15-15: Expanded Node.js version testing is good, but doesn't directly address the PR objective

The expansion of Node.js versions for testing (now including 20 and 22) is a positive change that improves the robustness of your CI process. However, it's worth noting that this change doesn't directly address the stated PR objective of updating the cookie package to resolve a security vulnerability.

To ensure that the cookie package has been updated as intended, please run the following script:

This script will help verify that the cookie package has been updated to version 0.7.2 as mentioned in the PR objectives.

package.json (2)

45-45: Consistency in removing --full-trace from coverage script.

The removal of the --full-trace option from the cov script is consistent with the change made to the test-local script.

Please refer to the previous comment regarding the test-local script change. The same considerations and suggestions apply to this modification.


27-27: Approve the cookie dependency update and verify CVE resolution.

The update of the cookie package from ^0.3.1 to ^0.7.2 is a significant change that addresses the security vulnerability mentioned in the PR objectives (CVE-2024-47764). This update is crucial for enhancing the security of the egg-onerror package.

To ensure that this update fully addresses the vulnerability, please run the following script:

jobs:
Job:
name: Node.js
uses: artusjs/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-test.yml@v1
uses: node-modules/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-test.yml@master
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider using a specific version tag instead of 'master'

The job source has been updated to use the master branch of the node-modules/github-actions repository. While this ensures you're always using the latest version, it may introduce instability to your CI process if there are breaking changes in the upstream repository.

Consider using a specific version tag instead:

-    uses: node-modules/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-test.yml@master
+    uses: node-modules/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-test.yml@v1

Replace v1 with the latest stable version available in the node-modules/github-actions repository.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
uses: node-modules/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-test.yml@master
uses: node-modules/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-test.yml@v1

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit fc57345 into master Oct 13, 2024
18 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the use-cookie-0.7.2 branch October 13, 2024 06:10
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2024
[skip ci]

## [2.3.0](v2.2.0...v2.3.0) (2024-10-13)

### Features

* use cookie@0.7.2 ([#39](#39)) ([fc57345](fc57345))
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2024
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CWE-74 Insecure Deployment: Unpatched Application: CVE-2024-47764 on egg-onerror -> cookie 0.3.1
1 participant