Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check if Recommandations should be in the document -- Vaccination Record document (Annatina Foppa, eHealth Suisse) #93

Closed
ig-feedback opened this issue Sep 24, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
ballot v1.0.0 - STU 2 discussion Diskussion in FHIR WG and/or eHS ready-2-review (see fix) Review the fix of the issue Structureal/Concept

Comments

@ig-feedback
Copy link
Collaborator

ch.fhir.ig.ch-vacd#1.0.0 /vaccination-record-document.html

Recommandations are made at a specific point in time, should they be made persistent in document form or not documented in the EPR / document? to be discussed

Annatina Foppa, eHealth Suisse

@ralych
Copy link
Collaborator

ralych commented Nov 2, 2021

see also issue #9 (already closed from informative ballot)

@oliveregger
Copy link
Collaborator

Gemäss Roeland Sections nicht relevant für ImmunizationRequest und Response
"Einfachste Variante": Bundle Collection or Message? -> äquivalent via CDS Hooks mit Prefetch aufbauen (CDS Hooks Container), separate Profildefinition unabhänging von CDS Hooks welche Daten angeben werden können

@ralych ralych added the ready-2-review (see fix) Review the fix of the issue label Dec 22, 2021
@ralych
Copy link
Collaborator

ralych commented Dec 22, 2021

Immunization recommendation section is removed - recommendations should not be stored in vaccinationrecords
For Recommendation Request and Response new structure is defined.

@eHealth-Suisse
Copy link
Collaborator

discussion 14.1.:
optionally, the request message should be added to the response

@eHealth-Suisse
Copy link
Collaborator

ok -> Recommandations are not part of the Vaccination Record document, but seperately as a message bundle. Can still be stored if necessary (for example into EPR)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ballot v1.0.0 - STU 2 discussion Diskussion in FHIR WG and/or eHS ready-2-review (see fix) Review the fix of the issue Structureal/Concept
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants