Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Substrate: Switch to BABE consensus algorithm #457

Closed
cernicc opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Substrate: Switch to BABE consensus algorithm #457

cernicc opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
pallet-storage-provider Relates to the Storage Provider Pallet
Milestone
Phase 3

Comments

@cernicc
Copy link
Member

cernicc commented Oct 17, 2024

Switch from Aura consensus algorithm to BABE. We need BABE as a prerequisite for secure randomness on chain.

https://docs.substrate.io/learn/consensus
@cernicc cernicc added the pallet-storage-provider Relates to the Storage Provider Pallet label Oct 17, 2024
@cernicc cernicc mentioned this issue Oct 17, 2024
Closed
@th7nder th7nder mentioned this issue Oct 17, 2024
Closed
38 tasks
@jmg-duarte jmg-duarte added this to the Phase 2 milestone Oct 23, 2024
@jmg-duarte jmg-duarte removed this from the Phase 2 milestone Nov 4, 2024
This was referenced Nov 5, 2024
Merged
Open
@th7nder th7nder added this to the Phase 3 milestone Nov 13, 2024
@cernicc cernicc self-assigned this Nov 18, 2024
@cernicc
Copy link
Member Author

cernicc commented Nov 22, 2024 •
edited by jmg-duarte
Loading

Hmm. While researching this. The Babe consensus algorithm was developed before the Aura. We are using Cumulus as an substrate extension, it helps us to easier make a Polkadot compatible parachain.

Cumulus decided not to support Babe. paritytech/cumulus#116 . I am not sure what changes would be needed to use babe without the cumulus part.

The decision if this should be done will depend on the decision on this. Switching to BABE is not practical for the parachain.

@cernicc cernicc removed their assignment Nov 22, 2024
@jmg-duarte jmg-duarte closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
pallet-storage-provider Relates to the Storage Provider Pallet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Phase 3
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@cernicc @th7nder @jmg-duarte