Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Missing Haddocks #5

Open
ekmett opened this issue Feb 4, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Missing Haddocks #5

ekmett opened this issue Feb 4, 2013 · 0 comments
Assignees
@ekmett

Comments

@ekmett
Copy link
Owner

ekmett commented Feb 4, 2013

We need haddocks for this package.

In addition to the non-existent laws, (Every law you can classically state is a free theorem) we need the extra requirement that if the type is Applicative then pure = point = return, and also if it is a Comonad then extract = copoint.

This ensures consistency of the hierarchy and avoids the worst abuses.
@ghost ghost assigned ekmett Feb 4, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ekmett ekmett

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ekmett