-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ILM setup misleads user when check_exists is false #24046
Labels
Comments
botelastic
bot
added
the
needs_team
Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label
label
Feb 15, 2021
adriansr
added
Team: Ingest
Team:Services
(Deprecated) Label for the former Integrations-Services team
labels
Feb 15, 2021
Pinging @elastic/integrations-services (Team:Services) |
botelastic
bot
removed
the
needs_team
Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label
label
Feb 15, 2021
andresrc
added
Team:Elastic-Agent
Label for the Agent team
and removed
Team: Ingest
Team:Services
(Deprecated) Label for the former Integrations-Services team
labels
Feb 15, 2021
Pinging @elastic/agent (Team:Agent) |
3 tasks
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
When a Beat is run with
setup.ilm.check_exists: false
It prints:
However, that is not true, as the function creating the write alias is silently skipping the creation of the index due to
check_exists
being false:In the scenario were ILM is not setup properly, this will result in the write index not being created. An index named after the write index created instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: