Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Containers are only ARM64 #1890

Closed
johnwc opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Containers are only ARM64 #1890

johnwc opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@johnwc
Copy link

johnwc commented Nov 13, 2023

Since 8.10, all containers in the docker repo are only ARM64. The last AMD64 release was 8.9.
https://www.docker.elastic.co/r/enterprise-search/elastic-connectors

@johnwc johnwc added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 13, 2023
@seanstory
Copy link
Member

Hi @johnwc

Thanks for the report. Looking into this, I can see how this is happening, as right now our release process is pretty manual, and looks like the architecture is dependent on whose laptop the release image gets built on. We have plans in the near term to make our release process more robust, but in the mean time, I suggest just building the image yourself from source.

@seanstory
Copy link
Member

@johnwc we haven't permanently resolved this issue yet, but we have just released 8.11.2.0 for amd64 architectures. See: https://container-library.elastic.co/r/enterprise-search/elastic-connectors

docker pull docker.elastic.co/enterprise-search/elastic-connectors:8.11.2.0

@sandermvanvliet-stack
Copy link

I see the latest 8.12 release of the connectors is arm64 only again. Any chance for a amd64 version of those?

@seanstory
Copy link
Member

seanstory commented Feb 6, 2024

Thanks for flagging. Automation to help us be consistent about this is coming soon!

In the mean time, we made sure to push 8.12.1.0 as an amd64 image:

docker pull docker.elastic.co/enterprise-search/elastic-connectors:8.12.1.0

https://www.docker.elastic.co/r/enterprise-search/elastic-connectors

@markjhoy
Copy link
Contributor

markjhoy commented Feb 15, 2024

This issue was addressed with #2152 -- going to close this out, as the new release process should be arm64, amd64, and a multi-arch image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants