-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 839
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[EuiSuperSelect] value
and generic discrepancy
#5154
Comments
👋 Hey there. This issue hasn't had any activity for 180 days. We'll automatically close it if that trend continues for another week. If you feel this issue is still valid and needs attention please let us know with a comment. |
👋 Hey there. This issue hasn't had any activity for 180 days. We'll automatically close it if that trend continues for another week. If you feel this issue is still valid and needs attention please let us know with a comment. |
👋 Hi there - this issue hasn't had any activity in 6 months. If the EUI team has not explicitly expressed that this is something on our roadmap, it's unlikely that we'll pick this issue up. We would sincerely appreciate a PR/community contribution if this is something that matters to you! If not, and there is no further activity on this issue for another 6 months (i.e. it's stale for over a year), the issue will be auto-closed. |
❌ Per our previous message, this issue is auto-closing after having been open and inactive for a year. If you strongly feel this is still a high-priority issue, or are interested in contributing, please leave a comment or open a new issue linking to this one for context. |
EuiSuperSelect accepts a generic to set the type of the
value
property (defaults tostring
), but there is an expectation (both in TypeScript and when setting theid
attribute) thatvalue
is always a string.Either
value
needs to be a string and we need to remove the generic, or we make the generic work and resolve the a11y/id
problem by generating or coercing a value forid
.The latter makes more sense to me, as there is no valid technical reason that
value
cannot be an object of arbitrary shape.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: