Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kibana timepicker rejects absolute datetime input if 'dateFormat' is configured to display timezone #106266

Open
Tracked by #194790
piehld opened this issue Jul 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Search Querying infrastructure in Kibana Feature:Timepicker Timepicker impact:medium Addressing this issue will have a medium level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. loe:small Small Level of Effort Team:DataDiscovery Discover, search (e.g. data plugin and KQL), data views, saved searches. For ES|QL, use Team:ES|QL.

Comments

@piehld
Copy link

piehld commented Jul 20, 2021

Kibana version:
7.13.2 and 7.13.3, and all earlier. Assumed in the case of 7.13.4 as well.

Elasticsearch version:
7.13.2 and 7.13.3, and all earlier. Assumed in the case of 7.13.4 as well.

Server OS version:
Ubuntu 20.04

Browser version:
Chrome 91.0.4472.164

Browser OS version:
Not relevant.

Original install method (e.g. download page, yum, from source, etc.):
apt-get

Describe the bug:
If the dateFormat setting is configured to include the timezone, then the timepicker doesn't accept user input until an explicit 'z' is typed in the field in-place of the timezone.

Advanced setting: dateFormat: MMM D, YYYY @ HH:mm:ss.SSS z

And here is a screen capture of the bug:
Jul-20-2021 10-29-29_4

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Set dateFormat: MMM D, YYYY @ HH:mm:ss.SSS z in Advanced Settings
  2. Go to the Time picker in any dashboard, visualization, discover, etc. in Kibana and try to change the absolute end or start time by manually typing it in the field.
  3. The Timepicker won't like your input until you replace the actual timezone with an explicit 'z' in place of it.

Expected behavior:
You shouldn't need to type an explicit 'z' in there.

Screenshots (if relevant):
See above.

Errors in browser console (if relevant):

Provide logs and/or server output (if relevant):

Any additional context:

@piehld piehld added the bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience label Jul 20, 2021
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jul 20, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-app-services (Team:AppServices)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jul 21, 2021
@Dosant Dosant added Feature:Timepicker Timepicker impact:medium Addressing this issue will have a medium level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. loe:small Small Level of Effort triaged labels Jul 21, 2021
@exalate-issue-sync exalate-issue-sync bot added loe:medium Medium Level of Effort and removed loe:small Small Level of Effort labels Jul 22, 2021
@exalate-issue-sync exalate-issue-sync bot added loe:small Small Level of Effort and removed loe:medium Medium Level of Effort labels Aug 12, 2022
@petrklapka petrklapka added Feature:Search Querying infrastructure in Kibana Team:DataDiscovery Discover, search (e.g. data plugin and KQL), data views, saved searches. For ES|QL, use Team:ES|QL. and removed Team:AppServicesSv labels Nov 23, 2022
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-data-discovery (Team:DataDiscovery)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Search Querying infrastructure in Kibana Feature:Timepicker Timepicker impact:medium Addressing this issue will have a medium level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. loe:small Small Level of Effort Team:DataDiscovery Discover, search (e.g. data plugin and KQL), data views, saved searches. For ES|QL, use Team:ES|QL.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants