Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add organization structure to watcher #20148

Closed
rukas opened this issue Jun 22, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Add organization structure to watcher #20148

rukas opened this issue Jun 22, 2018 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Feature:Watcher Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more

Comments

@rukas
Copy link

rukas commented Jun 22, 2018

This issue came from elastic/elasticsearch#31511

Currently there is no way to organize the watcher list into a folder or tree structure. As the list of watches grows it would be nice to have a way to organize the watches so that they're easier to find.

We currently use watches to alert on events from the following scenarios:

  • Using metricbeat for monitoring our servers, processes, and Windows services

  • Using heartbeat for monitoring server / service / URL up time

  • Using filebeat to gather logs and alert on the absence of the logs altogether as well as error level events and keyword events

  • Using winlogbeat to gather security and application logs and alert on server / database login events and other application error events

For our team this would allow us to break out the watches into a structure like the following:

  • Server Health

  • Application Health

  • Elasticsearch Cluster Health

  • User Specific watches

@bmcconaghy bmcconaghy added enhancement New value added to drive a business result and removed triage_needed labels Aug 15, 2018
@yaronp68 yaronp68 added Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more and removed :Management DO NOT USE labels Dec 5, 2018
@cjcenizal
Copy link
Contributor

@elastic/kibana-app-arch @elastic/kibana-platform Do we have a common need for this type of organization system throughout Kibana? If so, would it make sense to somehow make a centralized service for grouping entities into folders?

@lukeelmers
Copy link
Member

If you don't need a deeply nested tree, then this sounds like a problem that would possibly be solved by Saved Object Tagging, e.g. you attach an arbitrary tag to a saved object, and can later filter against that tag in the UI.

@cjcenizal
Copy link
Contributor

cjcenizal commented Aug 29, 2019

Thanks @lukeelmers! I think that's a great solution. Watches aren't saved objects (they're just documents), but they do support arbitrary metadata which could be used to store tags.

@cjcenizal cjcenizal added the Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams) label May 12, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-alerting-services (Team:Alerting Services)

@pmuellr
Copy link
Member

pmuellr commented May 14, 2020

FWIW, Kibana Alerting exposes tags on the top-level alert objects, and you can filter them in the search bar of the alerts list. Seems like it's worked out well, but we'll see ...

It would be interesting to think about a view of the alert lists that had groupings based on the tags, I guess a depth=2 tree, one branch for every unique tag, an alert could be listed under multiple tags, the tag lists are collapsible.

@gmmorris gmmorris removed the Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams) label Jul 2, 2021
@alisonelizabeth
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as not planned

@alisonelizabeth alisonelizabeth closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Feature:Watcher Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants