Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[search.aggregations] Add support for moving percentiles agg #65379

Closed
lukeelmers opened this issue May 5, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

[search.aggregations] Add support for moving percentiles agg #65379

lukeelmers opened this issue May 5, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Feature:Aggregations Aggregation infrastructure (AggConfig, esaggs, ...) impact:low Addressing this issue will have a low level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. loe:small Small Level of Effort

Comments

@lukeelmers
Copy link
Member

lukeelmers commented May 5, 2020 •
edited
Loading

The Elasticsearch team is currently working on adding a moving percentiles pipeline aggregation, which is similar to the moving function aggregation (used by "Moving Avg" in Kibana for historical reasons).

This issue exists to track adding the aggregation type to the data plugin search service, so that other plugins can incorporate the agg type in their own applications.
@lukeelmers lukeelmers added Feature:Aggregations Aggregation infrastructure (AggConfig, esaggs, ...) enhancement New value added to drive a business result Team:AppArch labels May 5, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-app-arch (Team:AppArch)

@rayafratkina rayafratkina mentioned this issue May 5, 2020
Closed
7 tasks
@exalate-issue-sync exalate-issue-sync bot added impact:low Addressing this issue will have a low level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. loe:small Small Level of Effort labels Jun 21, 2021
@ppisljar
Copy link
Member

ppisljar commented Aug 9, 2022

Thank you for contributing to this issue, however, we are closing this issue due to inactivity as part of a backlog grooming effort. If you believe this feature/bug should still be considered, please reopen with a comment.

@ppisljar ppisljar closed this as completed Aug 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Feature:Aggregations Aggregation infrastructure (AggConfig, esaggs, ...) impact:low Addressing this issue will have a low level of impact on the quality/strength of our product. loe:small Small Level of Effort
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@lukeelmers @ppisljar @elasticmachine