Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Formulate extensively in an answer-forcing manner, rather than open-ended questions #1

Open
llarsson opened this issue Mar 15, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@llarsson
Copy link
Contributor

llarsson commented Mar 15, 2021

In as great an extent as possible, re-formulate the document into a "yes or no" manner (implying there could be checkboxes one could tick or not tick), rather than open-ended questions, or ones that ask "when did you last X", so that it forces the reader to answer truthfully and with data.

For instance, "Describe your access control system for Kubernetes?" is very open-ended. It would be better broken down into questions regarding whether there is an identity provider, if there is a clear policy regarding who gets what access, if RBAC is used, to enforce that policy, and so on.

It requires more thinking on our part, but helps the customer immensely to see the value we can help them achieve.

@llarsson
Copy link
Contributor Author

llarsson commented May 4, 2021

Assigned @cristiklein instead, because currently has more time to take a stab at this.

@llarsson llarsson changed the title Formulate extensively in a yes/no manner, rather than open-ended questions Formulate extensively in an answer-forcing manner, rather than open-ended questions May 4, 2021
@jakubkrzywda jakubkrzywda self-assigned this Jun 4, 2021
@jakubkrzywda
Copy link
Contributor

I have created the Cloud Information Security Review Checklist following the suggestions from this issue, however Kubernetes checklist still needs to be improved.

@jakubkrzywda jakubkrzywda removed their assignment Jun 28, 2021
@cristiklein cristiklein removed their assignment Dec 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants