You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The back-end right now assumes SAFA AND nodes only have epsilon transitions.
That is not true; AND nodes only have skip transitions and it's always the case that those skips are total and disjoint:
This assumption is crucial for negation to work correctly and we now violate it by having nodes [e1 = \epsilon, e_2 = \epsilon, ...., e_n = \epsilon] such that Union_n [s1, s2, ... sn] = \epsilon, not the full interval (not total).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The back-end right now assumes SAFA AND nodes only have epsilon transitions.
That is not true; AND nodes only have skip transitions and it's always the case that those skips are total and disjoint:
This assumption is crucial for negation to work correctly and we now violate it by having nodes
[e1 = \epsilon, e_2 = \epsilon, ...., e_n = \epsilon]
such thatUnion_n [s1, s2, ... sn] = \epsilon
, not the full interval (not total).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: