You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This would align better with the Series function names. Plus, the arrange names come from R where they were chosen to avoid namespace conflicts. We don't have to worry about that here.
However, this would be a breaking change. This issue is to hash out that discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am happy to roll with sort_by and sort_with. We should keep arrange and arrange_with around with @deprecated "foobar" annotations. They can simply delegate to the new sort_by and sort_with.
There's been some discussion of renaming the
arrange
functions tosort
. E.g. here:Series.sort_by
andSeries.sort_with
#762 (comment)This would align better with the
Series
function names. Plus, thearrange
names come from R where they were chosen to avoid namespace conflicts. We don't have to worry about that here.However, this would be a breaking change. This issue is to hash out that discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: