-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Private Conversations #1980
Comments
nods At the beginning I wanted to do it for 1.0 (and I should have an outdated branch around), but I was side-tracked by several other things. lol For reference: |
The more I think about it - my mind also went down the 'lets make IRC on the web' path for a bit - the more I think we shouldn't differentiate private conversations and standard threads. A board is just a collection of conversations that specific usergroups have access to, after all. |
Yeah, in a sense. But use boards for "private" conversations may (or may not, depends on many factors) be a tricky in few ways (for example may lead to the creation of many boards) and it may have a performance impact difficult to quantify in advance (if it is what you are suggesting). Have "private discussions" mixed with "normal" (in the Wedge-way) is not something I really like that much because it makes difficult to understand what a person can see or not (for example I could share a link to a discussion in a board just to discover that I was one of the few having access to it, additionally, at the moment, there is a clear distinction between what an admin can and cannot see, etc.) |
One great thing that would allow a "conversation" set up, would be to have all (or at least the most recent ones) messages of the conversation in the box below the reply page. Something I'm missing a lot right now. 😋 |
The current PM schema really needs to die a horrible death >_> |
Since I was stuck with the theming overhaul, I started looking into this one instead. |
I'm not sure I'll be able to bring that one to 1.1 beta 1, and since it involves db schema change I feel it may have to wait the next round... :( |
Are DB schema changes out of the question? Finally getting to a position where I can devote some proper time to this. : / |
Of course no, there can very well be db schema changes between versions. If you can spend some time on it, feel very free to do it!! |
The DB schema changes I want are certainly rather major : / Was planning on trying to get to it in April but Distractions/Life happened. |
That's good, the current db schema doesn't work for conversations at all. ;D |
@Vekseid did you had any chance of looking into this? |
I've only just been able to start looking into the DB. Was a pretty hellish month. I've come to terms with the thought of this being pushed back. |
Vanilla does something like this, and I built a schema for this for the Phoenix project, as well as my own CMS.
Basically, PMs as they exist on most forums are an attempt to re-create e-mail in an environment completely unsuited for the task, and currently all forum software has ridiculously broken schemas for private messages. SMF's labels, phpBB's folders... MyBB doesn't even normalize the main message table, which causes all sorts of 'fun'.
A private conversation system would be vastly superior, both in terms of the database performance, and in terms of user experience. Ask members on my MyBB forum what they think of quote towers, or on my SMF forum what they think of conversation mode.
This would of course be a fairly major overhaul of the PM system, and possibly the thread/post system as well (if we decided to merge the concepts - a Private conversation basically being a thread with special access restrictions).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: