is the babel plugin babel-plugin-ember-template-compilation running there?
Can you try removing the typescript babel plugin config and add babel-plugin-ember-template-compilation instead?

I think there was a condition to only include it if there are any hbs files. I might be wrong

found it:

this is what I did to get it to work:
there was an issue that something is still removing the plugin if its in the list... so i had to make a re-export file

plugins: [
        require.resolve('ember-auto-import/babel-plugin'),
        [
          require.resolve('./babel-plugin-ember-template-compilation.js'), {
          compilerPath: require.resolve('ember-source/dist/ember-template-compiler.js'),
          targetFormat: 'hbs',
          enableLegacyModules: [
            'ember-cli-htmlbars',
            'ember-cli-htmlbars-inline-precompile',
            'htmlbars-inline-precompile',
            '@ember/template-compilation'
          ],
          transforms: [],
        }]

hi @patricklx

Is that added to the babel section of ember-cli-build.js? And if so, I'm getting an "Cannot find module './babel-plugin-ember-template-compilation.js'" error.

yes, you need to create the file ./babel-plugin-ember-template-compilation.js with the content

module.exports = require('babel-plugin-ember-template-compilation')

yes that compiles. thank you. it does not resolve my initial issue though...

so, this is to fix the issue in v1 addons, so the change needs to be done in the addon main entry file.
https://github.com/appuniversum/ember-appuniversum/blob/master/index.js#L13
instead of the '@babel/plugin-transform-typescript' entry, use the one from #2119 (comment)

onlyRemoveTypeImports is NOT supposed to be necessary on current versions of babel-plugin-ember-template-compilation. That is why we do everything in pre. https://github.com/emberjs/babel-plugin-ember-template-compilation/blob/cdbabfdbe12be6354b1bbb827a700952714e6d11/src/plugin.ts#L320. If there are cases that still need onlyRemoveTypeImports please make a reproduction.

the problem is that babel-plugin-ember-template-compilation wasn't included. it probably will be with the next release of ember-template-imports

it probably will be with the next release of ember-template-imports

That's not going to have any effect. Embroider doesn't let v1 addons decide whether or not to do their own template compilation.

But yeah, I'm starting to understand. I'll followup on the PR.

I wrote up more explanation in #2120 (comment) and this is a bug we can fix.

But also: it has long been recommended that v1 addon authors publish JS and not TS. Even ember-cli-typescript gave a ts:precompile command for that. Leaving the complexity for the app build is bad.

It's supported and we can keep fixing bugs, but please spread the word. People should not be publishing GTS (or GJS) to NPM. Compile it to javascript once instead of making every app author do it hundreds of times a day.

As for how to do that in a v1 addon: if I needed to do that I would probably start with the v2 blueprint and modify it slightly to publish in v1. The smallest thing that would probably work is:

1. Run the build.
2. Rename dist/_app_ to app
3. Rename dist to addon.
4. Use the standard v1 index.js file instead of the addon-shim one.
5. Delete version: 2 from package.json.

Now you have a valid v1 addon that's all pre-built with rollup and doesn't need a dependency on ember-template-imports or typescript.

in my case it are in repo (and private) addons. so i guess the js over ts argument does not apply here...

the js over ts argument does still apply because we're talking about module boundaries regardless if you're actually "publishing to npm". I have encouraged many people to imagine they are publishing to npm anyway and it has very often solved many problems for them 🎉

sure, yet I really want to write TS... :-)

He’s not saying to stop using TS. He’s saying to build each library’s TS to JS separately, so that all other packages only need to see the JS (and .d.ts).

But also: it has long been recommended that v1 addon authors publish JS and not TS. Even ember-cli-typescript gave a ts:precompile command for that. Leaving the complexity for the app build is bad.

I don't want to argue over whether publishing JS vs. TS is better, since I do think you are probably right. But also I wouldn't want to spend time on making a v1 addon pre-compile TS, given that most of our addons are v2 already, and the effort migrating to v2 is probably better spent where this is not the case.

However, I don't think you are right about what has been recommended for v1 addons, or can you point me to a place where this has been recommended? ember-cli-typescript's addon docs say the opposite:

When you publish an addon written in TypeScript, the .ts files will be consumed and transpiled by Babel as part of building the host application

Even though you publish the source .ts files [...]

And ts:precompile was not about transpiling TS to JS, it was only about generating d.ts:

In order for your addon's users to benefit from type information from your addon, you need to put .d.ts declaration files at the location on disk where the compiler expects to find them. This addon provides two commands to help with that: ember ts:precompile and ember ts:clean [...] The ts:precompile command will populate the overall structure of your package with .d.ts files

Should be fixed by #2120

And ts:precompile was not about transpiling TS to JS, it was only about generating d.ts:

Oh, I was mistaken then, I thought it also published the .js.