Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PostgreSQL Database version of SCOWL feedback.... #307

Open
kevina opened this issue Jan 15, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

PostgreSQL Database version of SCOWL feedback.... #307

kevina opened this issue Jan 15, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@kevina
Copy link
Member

kevina commented Jan 15, 2021

Use this thread for any public feedback you wish to leave for issue #306.

@Meekohi
Copy link

Meekohi commented Jan 15, 2021

Hard to weigh the benefits of this approach without more details, but it seems like using a Postgres database vs flat txt file as the final output is an independent concern from reorganizing words by grammatic category. Even if a Postgres database is used for intermediate processing, I suspect you'll find a lot of tools that depend on SCOWL will want the final output in the traditional format (for a long time, probably both the current format and whatever new format is proposed to group related words together), since this is much easier to manage and ship than a huge dependency like a database.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants