You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hi there ! i am trying to adapt the endpoints example to work with something similar to Books having many Tags but Tags not being unique to a specific book (because there might also be Magazines and other Books that share the Tag). would this always require joining with a through table? what if I also want to have Magazines associated with the same Tags collection -- would that require a second table to join?
https://gist.github.com/ononotofu/cb268fd3c5d8b37da376 has some related implementation. is a polymorphic association appropriate without a "Books_Tags" table -- and i'd prefer to not have many similarly named joining tables created to create the relationship. it seems like there is probably a best practice for something that comes up this often, but i can't find the same relationship mocked up in an example in either bookshelf or endpoints. appreciate any help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! I'm not sure if this will be an answer to your question, but I did the following way to establish many-to-many relations, using posts and tags example, where posts_tags is a join table.
hi there ! i am trying to adapt the endpoints example to work with something similar to Books having many Tags but Tags not being unique to a specific book (because there might also be Magazines and other Books that share the Tag). would this always require joining with a through table? what if I also want to have Magazines associated with the same Tags collection -- would that require a second table to join?
https://gist.github.com/ononotofu/cb268fd3c5d8b37da376 has some related implementation. is a polymorphic association appropriate without a "Books_Tags" table -- and i'd prefer to not have many similarly named joining tables created to create the relationship. it seems like there is probably a best practice for something that comes up this often, but i can't find the same relationship mocked up in an example in either bookshelf or endpoints. appreciate any help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: