swagger int32 array is recognized as Dart dynamic if present directly from body in swagger file.

[RoarGronmo]

Describe the bug
Swagger file with this section:

    "/Order/firmCountries": {
      "get": {
        "tags": [
          "Order"
        ],
        "responses": {
          "200": {
            "description": "Success",
            "content": {
              "text/plain": {
                "schema": {
                  "type": "array",
                  "items": {
                    "type": "integer",
                    "format": "int32"
                  }
                }
              },
              "application/json": {
                "schema": {
                  "type": "array",
                  "items": {
                    "type": "integer",
                    "format": "int32"
                  }
                }
              },
              "text/json": {
                "schema": {
                  "type": "array",
                  "items": {
                    "type": "integer",
                    "format": "int32"
                  }
                }
              }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    },

are recognized as dynamic not i.e. List<int>

BTW: You can recognize and remedy like this:

        var value = response?.body;

        var list_int = List<int>.from(value);

...but it should already have been recognized as List<int>.

Code generated in : *.swagger.dart

  ///
  @Get(path: '/Order/firmCountries')
  Future<chopper.Response> orderFirmCountriesGet();

Code generated in: *.swagger.chopper.dart

  @override
  Future<Response<dynamic>> orderFirmCountriesGet() {
    final $url = '/Order/firmCountries';
    final $request = Request('GET', $url, client.baseUrl);
    return client.send<dynamic, dynamic>($request);
  }

Here I Expected not Future<Response<dynamic>> to be returned, but Future<Response<List<int>>> instead.

To Reproduce
Yaml files
pubspec.yaml.txt
build.yaml.txt

Swagger file:
mwork_api.swagger.txt

Library version used:
2.2.10

[Vovanella95]

Hi @RoarGronmo
thanks for raising and issue. Will try to check it soon!

[Vovanella95]

Hi @RoarGronmo please check 2.3.0 version