Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Appearance of reactions (plus and arrow) is changing after applying the layout Server function #732

Closed
ZhannaNovikova opened this issue May 18, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@ZhannaNovikova
Copy link

ZhannaNovikova commented May 18, 2022

Case 1
Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Execute the /v2/indigo/layout with the following parameters:
    struct:
    structure with reaction arrow.zip

options: {
aromatize-skip-superatoms: true
gross-formula-add-isotopes: true
gross-formula-add-rsites: true
ignore-stereochemistry-errors: true
mass-skip-error-on-pseudoatoms: false
smart-layout: true
},
output_format: "chemical/x-indigo-ket"

Case 2
Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Execute the /v2/indigo/layout with the following parameters:
    struct:
    structure with reaction of the plus and arrow.zip
    options: {
    aromatize-skip-superatoms: true
    gross-formula-add-isotopes: true
    gross-formula-add-rsites: true
    ignore-stereochemistry-errors: true
    mass-skip-error-on-pseudoatoms: false
    smart-layout: true
    },
    output_format: "chemical/x-indigo-ket"

Expected behavior:
Response is received with correct reaction structure, e.g:
Response from Remote mode.zip

Actual behavior:
Appearance of reactions (plus and arrow) has been changed after applying the layout Server function

Note: the issue is reproducible in the Standalone mode only

Ketcher v2.4.2-331-ga26690b0
Version 1.7.0-alpha.0-gd57edc00d-wasm32-wasm-clang-13.0.0

@even1024
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed in 1.7.1

@mkviatkovskii mkviatkovskii modified the milestones: indigo-1.7.1, indigo-1.8 Jun 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants