Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extract serialize into seperate open source library #257

Open
epa095 opened this issue May 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Extract serialize into seperate open source library #257

epa095 opened this issue May 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers open-source Issues relating to our quest for open-source-ness

Comments

@epa095
Copy link
Contributor

epa095 commented May 11, 2019

I propose we start small and extract the serialize into a separate repo with tests, pip packages etc. It can be useful without the whole Gordo system, and let's us go baby steps to open source.

Maybe there is some git magic which let's us extract the git history for those files over to a new repo?

@flikka
Copy link
Contributor

flikka commented May 13, 2019

Do you suggest to have the serialize in a separate repo/library, or just as an "incremental" journey?

@epa095
Copy link
Contributor Author

epa095 commented May 13, 2019

As a seperate repo

@flikka
Copy link
Contributor

flikka commented May 13, 2019

Ok. Don't quite see what the magnificent use of that repo would be, but I am always open.

@milesgranger milesgranger added the open-source Issues relating to our quest for open-source-ness label Jun 4, 2019
@epa095 epa095 changed the title Extract serialize into open source Extract serialize into seperate open source library Jun 25, 2019
@flikka flikka added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Jan 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers open-source Issues relating to our quest for open-source-ness
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants