Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test result #17

Open
JamesZWalker opened this issue Nov 1, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

test result #17

JamesZWalker opened this issue Nov 1, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@JamesZWalker
Copy link

I use the model you provide to test on your SBU test dataset, and I get the result “Test ber results: 3.75”, which is larger than the result "ber:3.15" in your paper. I think maybe something is wrong but I dont know where. Could you provide some advice.

@eraserNut
Copy link
Owner

that we use the binarization operation (prediction = (prediction>90)*255) before CRF in SBU dataset. Because at that time, we observed that many pixels are positive but still under 127.5, we adjust it by binarization operation with bias. However, after the submission, we find that we can use the weighted BCE loss to achieve balance between positive and negative pixels. For restoring the setting before submission, we upload the old model.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants