Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support for complex number functions for currently supported types (Ex: real,conj) #126

Closed
favba opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Support for complex number functions for currently supported types (Ex: real,conj) #126

favba opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@favba
Copy link
Contributor

favba commented Sep 10, 2024

Simple generic codes such as:

f(x,y) = real(x)+y
f2(x,y) = conj(x)+y

Doesn't work with Vecs because real and conj are not defined for it.

Those are the two cases I encountered. There might be other similar cases.
@favba favba mentioned this issue Sep 10, 2024
Merged
@favba favba changed the title Support for generic functions that should be no-op for currently supported types (Ex: real,conj) Support for complex number functions for currently supported types (Ex: real,conj) Sep 17, 2024
@favba favba closed this as completed Sep 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@favba