-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
espflash
and cargo espflash
are flashing different bootloader
#326
Comments
This has been the case since I will document this for |
I've at least mentioned this auto-detection feature in the README with #327. |
I don't think there's really anything actionable here, so I'm going to close this issue. If you feel this is a mistake please feel free to re-open it, but other than mentioning this behaviour in the |
Yes, it would be perfect if it is just logged which one is actually used. |
Will be done in the next release, see #339. |
espflash 1.7.0
flashes a bootloader that is bundled withespflash
, butcargo espflash
takes bootloader from:target/xtensa-esp32-espidf/release/build/esp-idf-sys-049b1b8192557540/out/build/bootloader/bootloader.bin
I tried to enable
CONFIG_BOOTLOADER_APP_ROLLBACK_ENABLE
and it worked well on my dev machine where I always flash withcargo espflash
, but this feature did not work for devices that were flashed withespflash
.It took me quite some time to figure out that it is because of bootloader.
I noticed that after
cargo espflash
logs start with:But after
espflash
they started with:Not sure what is correct way to solve this confusion, maybe:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: