Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(esp_common): fix C++ variant of ESP_RETURN_VOID_ON_FALSE (IDFGH-14125) #14929

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chschu
Copy link

@chschu chschu commented Nov 24, 2024

Description

This PR fixes the ESP_RETURN_VOID_ON_FALSE macro used for recent versions of C++.

The macro parameter err_code is removed from the macro's parameter list. Other variants of the macro do not have that parameter, and it isn't used in the macro definition.

Checklist

Before submitting a Pull Request, please ensure the following:

  • 🚨 This PR does not introduce breaking changes.
    • I'm not sure about that. It could be considered a breaking change, because existing C++ code might use the macro with the extra parameter.
  • All CI checks (GH Actions) pass.
  • Documentation is updated as needed.
  • Tests are updated or added as necessary.
  • Code is well-commented, especially in complex areas.
  • Git history is clean — commits are squashed to the minimum necessary.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 24, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Messages
📖 🎉 Good Job! All checks are passing!

👋 Hello chschu, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests via this public GitHub repository.

This GitHub project is public mirror of our internal git repository

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved, we synchronize it into our internal git repository.
4. In the internal git repository we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
5. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.
5. On next sync from the internal git repository merged change will appear in this public GitHub repository.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against f948622

@espressif-bot espressif-bot added the Status: Opened Issue is new label Nov 24, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title fix(esp_common): fix C++ variant of ESP_RETURN_VOID_ON_FALSE fix(esp_common): fix C++ variant of ESP_RETURN_VOID_ON_FALSE (IDFGH-14125) Nov 24, 2024
@chschu chschu marked this pull request as ready for review November 24, 2024 23:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Opened Issue is new
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants