Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIPIP Meeting 74 #210

Closed
2 of 6 tasks
poojaranjan opened this issue Jan 25, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed
2 of 6 tasks

EIPIP Meeting 74 #210

poojaranjan opened this issue Jan 25, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member

poojaranjan commented Jan 25, 2023

Date and Time

Feb 08, 2023 at 16:00 UTC

Location

Zoom: TBA in the Discord #eip-editing channel

YouTube Live Stream/Recording: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4cwHXAawZxpLrRIkDlBjDUUrGgF91pQw

Agenda

1. Discuss Open Issues/PRs, and other topics

2. Discussion continued from earlier meetings

3. EIPs Insight - Monthly EIPs status reporting.

EIPsInsight.com
Hackmd

4. EIP Editing Office Hour

  • Recording
  • [Agenda Meeting 12]

5. TBA

6. Review action items from earlier meetings

Prev. meeting notes 73

Next meeting - Feb 22, 2023?

@poojaranjan poojaranjan mentioned this issue Jan 25, 2023
9 tasks
@SamWilsn
Copy link
Collaborator

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Contributor

Pandapip1 commented Jan 25, 2023

ethereum/EIPs#5682 is also something we should implement

@timbeiko
Copy link

timbeiko commented Feb 1, 2023

I'd like to bring up this proposal: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/proposal-forking-ercs-from-eips-repository/12804

@xinbenlv
Copy link

xinbenlv commented Feb 6, 2023

@poojaranjan
Could you add the continued discussion of ethereum/EIPs#5703 to agenda, hopefully get it settled this time.

@kdenhartog
Copy link

Could we add a discussion around adding an APAC friendly call time on an infrequent reoccurring period such as once every 4 meetings? I'm based in New Zealand so something at 20:00 UTC or later would work up until the change in daylight savings time I'd think which we'd just need to push it back a bit further then.

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member Author

Summary

  • 5508 - > agreed to be merged

  • 5682 - @SamWilsn is against it, and @Pandapip1 proposed an alternative proposal
      Sam & Matt are against having more flexibility for any sort of consideration. 
    continue discussing the Issue, and bring it back on the next call with more feedback.

  • EIP/ERC split - @timbeiko will talk to CL team to have volunteers to be engaged with the process with forced merged permissions if needed. He will share the decision after the ACDC meeting.

  • 5703 - @lightclient will add his comment to the PR to get @SamWilsn thoughts to have @xinbenlv added as ERC Editor.

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #213

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants