Fix linting

Author: bradleycamacho

pages/notices/custom-gas-tokens-deprecation.mdx

@@ -15,17 +15,17 @@ Additionally, advancements in Account Abstraction (AA) tooling now enable gas pa
 
 ## Highlights
 
-* Code removal: The Custom Gas Token code will be removed from the Optimism repo.
-* Migration to AA tooling: RaaS providers should explore Account Abstraction tools to replace Custom Gas Tokens. 
-* End of developer support: OP Labs Developer Support will no longer address CGT-related issues or requests.
+*   Code removal: The Custom Gas Token code will be removed from the Optimism repo.
+*   Migration to AA tooling: RaaS providers should explore Account Abstraction tools to replace Custom Gas Tokens. 
+*   End of developer support: OP Labs Developer Support will no longer address CGT-related issues or requests.
 
 ## Migration recommendations
 
-The Optimism ecosystem is focusing on interoperability within the Superchain, with efforts and incentives directed towards [standard configured chains](superchain/standard-configuration). We strongly recommend:
+The Optimism ecosystem is focusing on interoperability within the Superchain, with efforts and incentives directed towards [standard configured chains](/superchain/standard-configuration). We strongly recommend:
 
-* All new chains launch with the standard ETH gas token configuration.
-* Utilize Account Abstraction tooling to allow users to pay gas fees in alternative tokens instead of relying on Custom Gas Tokens.
-  * For example, a given chain can maintain ETH as its protocol gas token while using AA tooling to permit payments in their native token.
+*   All new chains launch with the standard ETH gas token configuration.
+*   Utilize Account Abstraction tooling to allow users to pay gas fees in alternative tokens instead of relying on Custom Gas Tokens.
+    *   For example, a given chain can maintain ETH as its protocol gas token while using AA tooling to permit payments in their native token.
 
 With CGT code removed from the monorepo, chains relying on this feature will find it increasingly difficult to stay up-to-date with the latest L1 and L2 OP Stack upgrades. While an external team might be able to maintain an unofficial fork of the Optimism monorepo that includes CGT support,  that is not guaranteed and introduces significant risks.
 
@@ -37,13 +37,13 @@ There are many account abstractions providers in the space. You should find the
 
 For any chain considering CGT post-deprecation, be aware of the following risks:
 
-* Fee mechanism flaws: Fees are charged as a scalar on blob fees denominated in ETH. This means CGT chains will either drastically overcharge or undercharge users for transaction fees relative to their L1 Data Availability costs.
+*   Fee mechanism flaws: Fees are charged as a scalar on blob fees denominated in ETH. This means CGT chains will either drastically overcharge or undercharge users for transaction fees relative to their L1 Data Availability costs.
 
-* Higher overhead for RaaS providers: Managing CGT chains requires RaaS providers to assume additional risk exposure to the custom gas token asset.
+*   Higher overhead for RaaS providers: Managing CGT chains requires RaaS providers to assume additional risk exposure to the custom gas token asset.
 
-* Security concerns: The CGT code modifies the L1 `OptimismPortal`, where all native assets are stored, and will not have undergone third-party auditing.
+*   Security concerns: The CGT code modifies the L1 `OptimismPortal`, where all native assets are stored, and will not have undergone third-party auditing.
 
-* Lack of future compatibility: Without official support from core protocol developers, there is no guarantee that future OP Stack upgrades will function properly with CGT-based chains.
+*   Lack of future compatibility: Without official support from core protocol developers, there is no guarantee that future OP Stack upgrades will function properly with CGT-based chains.
 
 ### Need help?