[bug, feature] Stagnant bot shouldn't mention EIP Editors.

[MicahZoltu]

The EIP Editors don't need to take any action when the bot alerts of a stagnant EIP. The authors need to be notified so they can override but the editors don't have any action to take so they shouldn't be mentioned.

[MicahZoltu]

The issue here is that the merge bot is piping up on the stagnant EIPs. Ideally it would skip over those.

[lightclient]

It also seems like it require editor approval too? This should auto merge after some grace period I think.

[poojaranjan]

I am blanking if a grace period is already decided, if not, it could be up to 2 weeks (inspired by the "Last Call").

It would be nice to have the message delivered in the original message to the author that the EIP author has 2 weeks time to resuscitate the proposal.

[alita-moore]

editors are removed by 92f5c11

what's the consensus on grace period? cc @MicahZoltu @lightclient @poojaranjan

[MicahZoltu]

Two weeks is fine with me.

[alita-moore]

ok, that behavior is defined here: 6ca2786