Add draft background image to draft EIPs

[Pandapip1]

Proposed Change

A concern people have had about auto merging draft EIPs without editor review (#5641) was that they might be low quality, and might reflect poorly on EIPs as a whole. Therefore, to enable this change to happen, I propose this be added as a tiled background image on all Draft EIPs:

[Pandapip1]

(Yes, this is a serious proposal, although the image can be tweaked if need be if there are legibility concerns)

[abcoathup]

I don't mind a DRAFT watermark.

If you go down this path should also have watermarks to warn of any state a reader should be on the alert for when reading a standard, e.g. WITHDRAWN and STAGNANT.

I would also keep it simple as just DRAFT

[SamWilsn]

Completely agree with @abcoathup. Just the status, lightly watermarked, except for final.

[github-actions]

There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.

[Pandapip1]

@lightclient @axic @gcolvin thoughts?

[lightclient]

This implies that other EIPs are peer reviewed 😬. It just seems unnecessary. I would rather they get a draft identifier instead like DEIP-XXXX.

[Pandapip1]

This implies that other EIPs are peer reviewed 😬.

Are the editors not peers?

[Pandapip1]

I would rather they get a draft identifier instead like DEIP-XXXX.

Same here! If I had to pick between one or the other, I would pick draft identifiers.

However, we are lucky enough to be able to be able to support both! Even though you feel it is unnecessary, are you at all opposed to its implementation?

[lightclient]

Yes I strongly don't think we should watermark.

[Pandapip1]

Yes I strongly don't think we should watermark.

Fair enough. I'll leave this open in case other editors strongly disagree with lightclient here, but I'm okay with letting this die out.

[github-actions]

There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.

[SamWilsn]

Yes I strongly don't think we should watermark.

Why @lightclient? I think a subtle watermark of "Draft", "Review", "Last Call", or "Withdrawn" would be great.

The "non peer-reviewed" part is probably misleading, like you mentioned.

[github-actions]

There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.

[github-actions]

This issue was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback.