Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Nodes and Clients" page has outdated / missing information on clients' supported networks #7401

Closed
ThreeMuskets12 opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
bug 🐛 Something isn't working Status: Stale This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity.

Comments

@ThreeMuskets12
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug

On the "Nodes and Clients" page, the 'networks' column of the execution clients section does not list Sepolia as a supported network for any clients.

Additionally, the 'networks' column of the consensus clients section does not list Sepolia's beacon chain or Ropsten's beacon chain as a supported network for any clients.

Also I feel like the way the 'networks' column of the consensus clients uses the beacon chain names for testnets instead of the execution chains for testnets is kind of confusing to end users, especially for networks that have already undergone The Merge. For example, it was discussed on Consensus Layer Call 91 that referring to the now-merged "Goerli + Prater" network should just be referred to as "Goerli". Source

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to '"Nodes and Clients" page'
  2. Scroll down to the table under 'EXECUTION CLIENTS (FORMERLY 'ETH1 CLIENTS')'
  3. See outdated / missing information in the 'Networks' column

Also

  1. Go to '"Nodes and Clients" page'
  2. Scroll down to the table under 'CONSENSUS CLIENTS (FORMERLY 'ETH2 CLIENTS')'
  3. See outdated / missing information in the 'Networks' column

Expected behavior

-Sepolia should be listed as a supported network for all execution clients that support it
-Sepolia and Ropsten should be listed as supported networks for all consensus clients that support it
-[Potentially] network names for consensus clients should not be the name of the networks' beacon chain, and should instead be the name of the network itself. (IE not 'Prater' but 'Goerli')

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: All
  • Browser: All
  • Version: All
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status: Stale This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. label Sep 26, 2022
@corwintines corwintines removed the Status: Stale This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. label Oct 15, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2022

This issue is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status: Stale This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. label Dec 5, 2022
@corwintines
Copy link
Member

Closing with the above PR's merged in

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug 🐛 Something isn't working Status: Stale This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants