Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execution Layer Meeting 192 #1098

Closed
timbeiko opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 10 comments
Closed

Execution Layer Meeting 192 #1098

timbeiko opened this issue Jul 10, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

timbeiko commented Jul 10, 2024

Meeting Info

Agenda

@ralexstokes
Copy link
Member

Wanted to bring attention to EIP-7742: ethereum/EIPs#8735

The CL changes are here: ethereum/consensus-specs#3800

I am not sure if I will be able to make this call. If I can, I'll give a short overview of the EIP. If not, I'll ask client teams to take a look.

It's a small change and I would suggest Pectra inclusion. There's some uncertainty around PeerDAS and blob count increase timelines IMO and if we end up not touching that in Pectra then I think delaying this particular EIP until the next hard fork would be fine.

@ulerdogan
Copy link

About the EIP-7212 agenda, I want to repost my message from the Discord ACD channel which I think is relevant.

Hello! I am Ulaş, RIP editor and co-author of RIP-7212. Before the next ACDE this week, I wanted to prepare a short brief (in my view, please correct me if I am wrong) to help with the decision of including the proposal in the Pectra hard fork. It includes history, current implementations summary, some debates, and my final view.

https://hackmd.io/@ulerdogan/B1QikMxdC

@ankitchiplunkar
Copy link

We did an EIP7702 whiteboarding session at ETHCC, and want to get additional feedback on some changes to the spec.
Writeup: https://hackmd.io/@S9AwbucvTS6GYodLz-G1SQ/S102UtTwA

The proposal, reduces work required to manage DOS, enables new use-cases and supports ephemeral SCAs.

@Jrachman
Copy link

We wrote a response to the above CODERESET proposal and a reflection on the current 7702 spec’s state: https://hackmd.io/@otim/SJ8FGKBd0

@yoavw
Copy link

yoavw commented Jul 18, 2024

We wrote a response to the above CODERESET proposal and a reflection on the current 7702 spec’s state: https://hackmd.io/@otim/SJ8FGKBd0

Thanks. Please see my comments in your md.

@lightclient
Copy link
Member

Would be good to confirm that we're going to add logs to EIP-7002 and EIP-7251 system contracts (via) lightclient/sys-asm#17

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Added everything above to the agenda 🫡 !

@rakita
Copy link

rakita commented Jul 18, 2024

It would be good to link the discussion on EOF that happened in a response to Marius EOF concerns post: https://discord.com/channels/595666850260713488/745077610685661265/1261382042944274524

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@rakita I linked it in my EthMag summary.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this issue in favor of #1104

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants