Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RMSE Error on EuRoC Dataset #260

Open
YilmazKadir opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

RMSE Error on EuRoC Dataset #260

YilmazKadir opened this issue Jun 2, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@YilmazKadir
Copy link

Hello,
I am evaluating ROVIO algorithm in VIO mode. In the paper it is stated that in EuRoC MH_01 data they achieve 0.178m RMSE, and in V2_01 they achieve 0.064 m RMSE. Which alignment procedure are you using? I am using evo package and I achieve 0.213885 m RMSE for MH_01 and 0.103967 m RMSE for V2_01. Can you explain why I can not achieve the same results?

How I calculate RMSE:
I run the algorithm in VIO mode and save the map.
I open the maplab console, load the map and export the vertices using csv_export.
I convert the vertices.csv file into TUM format.
I use evo_ape euroc command with alignment (-a) and these are the results I get for MH_01:

MH01_ROVIO
MH01_ROVIO_traj

APE w.r.t. translation part (m)
(with SE(3) Umeyama alignment)

   max	0.987680
  mean	0.178013
median 0.162161
   min	0.006351
  rmse	0.213885
   sse	83.213396
   std	0.118567
@amichayfeldman
Copy link

I also got strange behavior.
I didn't get the paper's results and in addition I got with ROVIOLI worse results than VIO mode in MH1 data.

@araujokth
Copy link

araujokth commented Aug 13, 2020

Have you tried running maplab from the pre-release-march-2018 branch https://github.com/ethz-asl/maplab/tree/pre_release_public/march-2018? As they state in the release notes you may be able to achieve better results #55

Please see my updated comment on #261 (comment), I think this solves your problem

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants