You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi
I tried running ROVIOLI on a rosbag containing raw fisheye images and raw IMU data from a Lenovo phone. The fisheye camera and IMU are calibrated.
Here is the VI map I got:
View from top
View from side
I am wondering if having landmarks far above/below the graph is expected, or if it can be an issue. I would expect landmarks to be in a band of around 3 meters (height of the building) while here it is more something like 8 meters.
If it is an issue, can this be avoided by tweaking some rovioli parameters or does it indicate that there is something wrong with my calibration file?
Hi
I tried running ROVIOLI on a rosbag containing raw fisheye images and raw IMU data from a Lenovo phone. The fisheye camera and IMU are calibrated.
Here is the VI map I got:
View from top
View from side
I am wondering if having landmarks far above/below the graph is expected, or if it can be an issue. I would expect landmarks to be in a band of around 3 meters (height of the building) while here it is more something like 8 meters.
If it is an issue, can this be avoided by tweaking some rovioli parameters or does it indicate that there is something wrong with my calibration file?
Note:
Many thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: