Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HDK Feedback: Make trust evidence provision to Attestation Providers optional #285

Open
sander opened this issue Jul 19, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@sander
Copy link

sander commented Jul 19, 2024

Context: #282

Scope: High Level Requirements on Wallet Trust Evidence (Topic 9)

Summary: The ARF requires Attestation Providers to obtain trust evidence (Wallet Trust Evidence, or possibly related Issuer Trust Evidence). Instead, alternative approaches such as remotely derived HDK could provide Attestation Providers with assurance about the security level of a newly generated key (#284). At least in such cases, the additional trust evidence would create unnecessary overhead and potentially provide more user metadata than minimally needed. The requirements should be adjusted to not require this functionality in all cases.

Detailed suggestions and rationale: HDK v0.1.0 feedback on Topic 9 regarding WTE_*, WTE_17, WTE_20, WTE_23, WTE_24.

ARF version: 1.4.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant