You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi everyone,
I could be completely missing something here, but it looks the debowerify package at npm has drifted from the current master. Specifically, it does not include the preferNPM property to favor npm dependencies over bower ones.
Version 1.3.1 was published to NPM 9 months ago. The pull request for preferNPM occurred 4 months ago. @eugeneware Are you able to publish to npm, so the latest package has this feature? Or if i'm doing something stoopid, correct my stoopid?
Thanks! :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey @rovens - The issue was that the code was merged, but not published with a new version. I've bumped the version to 1.4 and published. Sorry!
For future reference (as debowerify is an Open Open Source Project), after a merge to master (and all the tests pass of course!) we need to:
update package.json with the new semver version.
Tag the release with the version number and git push, git push --tags and then npm publish
If the contribution is not a collaborator, give the originator of the PR collaborator access to the repo.
@rovens I've added you to the Contributor list on the README, and added you as a collaborator. If you'd like npm publish access, please let me know what your npm username is.
And have a read through the Open Open Source thread to see how this is all supposed to work (or in this case didn't LOL!)
Hi everyone,
I could be completely missing something here, but it looks the debowerify package at npm has drifted from the current master. Specifically, it does not include the preferNPM property to favor npm dependencies over bower ones.
Version 1.3.1 was published to NPM 9 months ago. The pull request for preferNPM occurred 4 months ago.
@eugeneware Are you able to publish to npm, so the latest package has this feature? Or if i'm doing something stoopid, correct my stoopid?
Thanks! :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: