-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reference period #20
Comments
I think we will be finally forced to re-do the analyses using the CMIP5 EURO-CORDEX runs, so we are more free to choose the periods. In this sense, @csteger also mentioned:
There is a work already planned on trends, but we could use the periods to look into this observed climate change issue. If we define two analysis periods (at least for some of the analyses): 1981-2000 and 2001-2020, we could use the first one to compare with the old ensemble and the second one to evaluate recent climate change wrt the 1981-2000 in the new ensemble. Drawback: these are 20-yr periods. For extremes, we should consider the whole 40yr period. Although, extremes are tricky on a non-stationary system, anyway. Maybe we could leave extremes entirely for the dedicated work on them. |
@jesusff : As there is a paper dedicated to the analysis of the past trends (nabat et al.) and another to the GCM-RCM inconsistency in the paper list, I would avoid to tackle this issue in the general paper |
generally speaking, I fine with the 1991-2020 period for the reference, hoping that it will be one of the reference periods adopted by the next IPCC reports |
We can use the 1991-2020 period as the main reference period to evaluate the ability of the new Euro-CORDEX-CMIP6 RCMs to simulate the recent climate and several periods for different kinds of additional analysis (trends if included, CORDEX-CMIP6 RCMs vs CORDEX-CMIP5 ones, etc.). |
from @gnikulin email:
comment by @sam-somot via email:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: