Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3.3.1 should revert back to previous retrolambda version because 2.3.1 causes bad code to be generated for some lambdas... #219

Closed
kenyee opened this issue Nov 15, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

@kenyee
Copy link

kenyee commented Nov 15, 2016

FYI...in case anyone else gets bit by this:
luontola/retrolambda#115

@evant
Copy link
Owner

evant commented Nov 15, 2016

You can downgrade the version yourself with

dependencies {
  retrolambdaConfig 'net.orfjackal.retrolambda:retrolambda:2.2.0'
}

I'll think about changing the default, ideally this should be fixed upstream though.

@sp-1234
Copy link

sp-1234 commented Nov 23, 2016

ideally this should be fixed upstream though.

from upstream:

Latest commit 93ff6ad on 30 Apr

and today is November…
I doubt that we live in an ideal world, at least right now.

@kenyee
Copy link
Author

kenyee commented Nov 23, 2016

The config param works fine to include an older version...just wanted to flag this in case anyone else hit this issue...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 2, 2016

I've just hit this wall.
@evant Thank you for the solution.

@rpattabi
Copy link

rpattabi commented Jan 22, 2017

luontola/retrolambda#115 is fixed now. This issue may be closed.

@kenyee kenyee closed this as completed Jan 22, 2017
@sp-1234
Copy link

sp-1234 commented Jan 23, 2017

shouldn't it be closed when a new version is released which uses retrolambda 2.5?

@kenyee
Copy link
Author

kenyee commented Jan 23, 2017

Oops...that's a fair point @sp-1234 :-)

@kenyee kenyee reopened this Jan 23, 2017
@evant
Copy link
Owner

evant commented Jan 24, 2017

Fixed in 3.5.0

@evant evant closed this as completed Jan 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants