You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Codon seems very promising in its ability to accelerate computationally-heavy Python applications. However, its adoption currently faces an important issue - the lack of native support for important Python computational frameworks and libraries.
Maybe it would be useful to have one issue that would aggregate the most important libraries to port?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@janekb04 In my opinion, that may not be the most appropriate approach. Porting all the necessary libraries to make PyTorch Codon native would be a never-ending process since there are so many libraries involved:
astunparse
expecttest
hypothesis
numpy
psutil
pyyaml
requests
setuptools
types-dataclasses
typing-extensions
sympy
filelock
networkx
jinja2
fsspec
Also, Codon performance is on par with Numpy performance. Perhaps the best approach is to port the program from NumPy to Codon. The same goes for PyTorch.
Similar to #224, which is about numpy.
Codon seems very promising in its ability to accelerate computationally-heavy Python applications. However, its adoption currently faces an important issue - the lack of native support for important Python computational frameworks and libraries.
Maybe it would be useful to have one issue that would aggregate the most important libraries to port?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: