Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Track policies (with a view to create POLICIES.md) #114

Closed
sjwarner-bp opened this issue Dec 29, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Track policies (with a view to create POLICIES.md) #114

sjwarner-bp opened this issue Dec 29, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@sjwarner-bp
Copy link
Contributor

It would be most useful to have a succinct list of the current track policies, to allow future contributors (and reviewers) to facilitate the most desirable contributions.

This would also be a great reference tool, and would be a useful part of a template for PRs.

Before this PR, I'd like a discussion to take place regarding current policies (older members of @exercism/bash may have a better idea of longer-standing policies) and policies we should strive to implement/achieve.

@sjwarner-bp sjwarner-bp changed the title Add POLICIES.md Track policies (with a view to create POLICIES.md) Dec 29, 2017
@sjwarner-bp
Copy link
Contributor Author

It seems like a good starting point would be "Plain Bash over POSIX compliance", as decided in #88.

@sjwarner-bp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Another could be to formally record an onboarding process / document how we will ensure that onboarding is as easy as possible.

The Java track (where I have most experience) do this by having a number of good-first-patch issues open at any one time.

@sjwarner-bp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Further, documenting the decision to come out of #87 would be beneficial to future contributors.

@budmc29
Copy link
Member

budmc29 commented Dec 30, 2017

POSIX compliance can be added: #88 (comment)

@budmc29
Copy link
Member

budmc29 commented Jan 29, 2018

Test structure can be added: #150

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants