You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In paper, you mentioned that masking is done on the raw images. However, in put code, masking is only done after the stem layer. Can you explain the inconsistency? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it is because the output of the stem layer is aligned to the patch boundaries so the two are equivalent, and this way allows the mask layers to be at lower resolution. You could potentially save some compute by not calculating the stem of masked-out blocks but maybe the overhead prevents this from being worthwhile.
Dear Author,
In paper, you mentioned that masking is done on the raw images. However, in put code, masking is only done after the stem layer. Can you explain the inconsistency? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: